John Wallace ICC opinion
On the debate of the International criminal court, I believe that Elena Baylis's proposal for stronger national and regional courts is very strong. This is due to a multitude of factors. For one, the law is not a unified set of rules, but rather an extremely flexible term that varies widely across the globe. An international body attempting to regulate such a flexible term is ineffective and nearly impossible. Local, regional, or even national backlash is sure to follow In response to such an overreach. Especially as the international body serves to push its own definition of the law.
Baylis offers a great solution to the ineffectiveness of the ICC. The ICC should not be thought of as a concrete body, serving to settle individual cases as a normal court would do. But rather, it would serve as an organization focused on bridging the gap between different courts on all levels. By acknowledging their differences and working to serve as a "bridge" between them. The ICC can greatly increase the effectiveness of regional and national courts through technical and political support.
Baylis offers a great solution to the ineffectiveness of the ICC. The ICC should not be thought of as a concrete body, serving to settle individual cases as a normal court would do. But rather, it would serve as an organization focused on bridging the gap between different courts on all levels. By acknowledging their differences and working to serve as a "bridge" between them. The ICC can greatly increase the effectiveness of regional and national courts through technical and political support.
Comments
Post a Comment